Tuesday’s the big day! We’re having a short rally at 4:00 at the Oregon Convention Center before lining up to sign the testimony sheet which ODOT will put out at 4:30. We’re still putting together our last-minute plans for the event – be sure to check out our facebook event page/twitter for all the latest information. We understand it’s a work day, and we hope you’ll join us whenever you can! ODOT is removing the sign-up sheet at 6:00pm, so if you plan to testify you need to be at the hearing before then. We’ll have fliers, stickers, new buttons, magnets, copies of Sarah Mirk’s new zine about us, information on how to testify, and posters to distribute. The legendary Paul Rippey is rumored to be making an appearance!
If you can’t make the event, we’ll post the link to a livestream video of the hearing on social media if ODOT provides one.
Thanks to all who came to Wonk Night!
(Photo Credit Jonathan Maus)
Thanks to BikePortland, The Street Trust, Lancaster Engineering for hosting the “Wonk Night” last week, and thanks to the dozens of individuals who attended! We’re thrilled to see so many people showing up to dig into the technical details of the Environmental Assessment document that ODOT has provided and point out some of the critical flaws about the proposed designs. Check BikePortland.org for a recap of the findings from the community review of the document.
Outstanding Turnout at ODOT’s Open House
No response from ODOT:
Where’s the data?
Last Monday, we sent a letter to ODOT asking for access to numerous data sets that were not included in the Environmental Assessment. The main document that ODOT is using to base their traffic projections (and therefore, the assessments on how this project would impact carbon emissions and air pollution) is missing *numerous* data sets, figures, appendices and riddled with inconsistencies. We are currently 22 days into a 45 day public comment period, and community members have not been given any opportunity to meaningfully independently assess ODOT’s (very dubious) claims. Meanwhile, while the Environmental Assessment is missing all those facts and figures, Joe Cortright at City Observatory wrote at length about what *is* in the document:“When it comes to the proposed half billion dollar I-5 Rose Quarter Freeway widening project, the Environmental Assessment is less of an honest and objective disclosure, and much more a carefully edited and thinly veiled sales brochure. The hucksterism starts with the name of the project, proceeds through its “communication plan,” and is executed in technical documents that have been carefully edited to remove the most salient information.”
Have you submitted your public comment yet?
– Published in the Portland Mercurylast week.
– Aaron Brown, on KATU News on March 7thSightline Institute updated and republished their FAQs about the project.“After sitting in traffic for over an hour on my way back to Portland from my job substitute teaching in Hillsboro, I’m almost tempted to believe Oregon Department of Transportation’s plan to invest $450 million in a 1.8-mile lane highway expansion sounds like a good idea. Luckily, I spent the day teaching students about the importance of research and data and how our notions of common sense are not always rooted in reality. Highway expansion, it turns out, is one of those instances.”
– A fantastic letter to the editor published in The Oregonianfrom Susie Kassouf in Southeast PortlandWe were on XRAY in the Morning on Thursday, March 7th, and we’ll be on the Heather McCoy show on KBOO at 10am on March 14th (apologies for those who tuned in last week – KBOO double-booked themselves!).
We celebrate #InternationalWomensDay by highlighting the work of Connie McCready and Marjie Lundell, who successfully fought freeway expansion in Northwest Portland in the 1970s, published in BikePortland in 2016.
New swag! Same fundraising ask!
We’re excited for this public comment period to end and for the chance to mail y’all all the buttons, magnets, and copies of Sarah Mirk’s zine on our campaign that you could possibly want.